Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818044›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement2024

Young people in iNaturalist: a blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring.

Christothea Herodotou, Nashwa Ismail, Ana I Benavides Lahnstein, Maria Aristeidou, Alison N Young, Rebecca F Johnson, Lila M Higgins, Maryam Ghadiri Khanaposhtani, Lucy D Robinson, Heidi L Ballard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of science education. Part B. Communication and public engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christothea HerodotouInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0980-1632
Nashwa IsmailSchool of Education, Durham University, Durham, England.
Ana I Benavides LahnsteinNatural History Museum, London, UK.
Maria AristeidouInstitute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-7267
Alison N YoungCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-0661
Rebecca F JohnsonCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lila M HigginsNatural History Museum Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Maryam Ghadiri KhanaposhtaniUC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-8527
Lucy D RobinsonNatural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-3447
Heidi L BallardUC Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-8293

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in authentic research in the field and online through Community and Citizen Science (CCS) has shown to bring learning benefits to volunteers. In online CCS, available platforms present distinct features, ranging from scaffolding the process of data collection, to supporting data analysis and enabling volunteers to initiate their own studies. What is yet not well understood is how best to design CCS programmes that are educational, inclusive, and accessible by diverse volunteers, including young people and those with limited prior science experiences who are rather few in CCS. In this study, we interviewed 31 young people, aged 7-20 years old, who used iNaturalist, an online biodiversity monitoring platform, and identified how different forms of participation online and in the field facilitated (or inhibited) certain forms of learning, as defined by the Environmental Science Agency framework. Findings revealed that iNaturalist enabled participation of young people including those with limited science experiences and facilitated science learning such as the development of science competence and understanding. A blended learning framework for biodiversity monitoring in CCS is presented as a means to support the development of hybrid, educational, and inclusive CCS programmes for young people.

Indexed as

biodiversity monitoringblended learningCommunity citizen scienceyoung people

Identifiers

PMID38818044
PMCPMC11138322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.