ATTLAS, IMpower151 and ORIENT-31: Dusting off IMpower150 for Post-Osimertinib in

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Advances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
   Review
2. Impact of EGFR Mutation Subtypes on Response to Chemoimmunotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After EGFR-TKI Failure.Targeted oncology · 2025
   Article
3. Case report: Durable response from tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) combined with fruquintinib and sintilimab as a third-line treatment for MSS metastatic colorectal cancer with a BRAF V600E mutation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as