Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818004›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Outcomes of Robotic Surgery in a Single-institution, High-volume Hepatobiliary Oncology Unit.

Kunal Nandy, Shraddha Patkar, Gurudutt Varty, Tanvi Shah, Mahesh Goel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07632638 (Safety and Technical Evaluation of a Robotic Platform), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07632638 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Technical Evaluation of a Robotic Platform (RonovoTM) in Elective Oncological Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-Specialty Registry

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto do Cancer do Estado de São PauloRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsMalignant Neoplasms, CancerArmsRonovoTM Robotic Surgical Platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunal NandyDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Shraddha PatkarDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Gurudutt VartyDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Tanvi ShahDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Mahesh GoelDivision of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatobiliary surgery has traditionally been performed via an open approach. With the advent of robotic surgery, the minimal access approach in hepatobiliary oncology has gained impetus due to its technical superiority and favorable learning curve over laparoscopy. We present our experience with the Da Vinci Xi system in hepatobiliary oncology. This is a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent surgery between June 2015 and July 2023 for suspected gallbladder cancer and primary or metastatic liver tumors were included. After excluding all inoperables and conversions, a total of 92 patients were included for analysis. There was a conversion rate of 15.6% (17 of 109 patients). Sixty-four (69.6%) patients underwent surgery for gallbladder-related pathologies that included 39 (60.9%) radical cholecystectomies, 24 (37.5%) simple cholecystectomies, and 1 (0.01%) revision cholecystectomy. Twenty-eight patients underwent surgeries for primary or metastatic liver tumors, which included 25 (92.9%) minor and 2 (7.1%) major hepatectomies. Significant morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or more) was seen in 8 (8.6%). There was no postoperative mortality. In the group with gallbladder cancer, the median lymph nodal yield was 7 (2-22) in patients who underwent lymph nodal dissection. The median follow-up was 63.9 (0.49-100.67) (IQR = 37.76) months. The 5-year OS and DFS were 76.4 and 71.3%, respectively. Robotic hepatobiliary surgery is feasible and can be performed safely after adequate training. Patient selection is of utmost importance and is the key to establishing a robust robotic hepatobiliary oncosurgery program.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyHepatectomyMetastatectomyRadicalRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38818004
PMCPMC11133256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.