Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817999›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024

Shuchismita Chakraborty, Shibajyoti Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuchismita ChakrabortyDepartment of General Surgery, Medical College Kolkata, 88, College Street, Kolkata, 700073 West Bengal India.ORCID 0000-0001-6420-9557
Shibajyoti GhoshDepartment of General Surgery, Medical College Kolkata, 88, College Street, Kolkata, 700073 West Bengal India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies conducted worldwide in the last few decades have demonstrated that various high- and low-frequency inherited and somatic mutations play important roles in the pathogenesis of periampullary carcinoma. Owing to relatively inaccessible location and lack of specific early diagnostic signs, majority of periampullary tumors are difficult to manage. Limited chemotherapeutic options that are available are highly toxic and not very efficacious. CyclinD1, if found to be amplified in these malignancies, might become an important gene to be targeted for monoclonal antibody therapy. An analytical retrospective-prospective study was done on 35 patients of operable periampullary carcinoma, in Medical College, Kolkata from January 2019 to July 2020. After isolating DNA from tumor and corresponding normal tissue by Qiagen DNEasy kit, CyclinD1 amplification was assessed by RT-PCR using Taqman DNA copy number in the laboratory of Indian Statistical Institute. Survival analysis was done by Kaplan-Meier estimator and all statistical calculations performed through SPSS software. Six (17%) out of 35 patients were found to have > twofold amplifications of CyclinD1 gene. However, no positive correlation was found between CyclinD1 amplification and overall survival of the patients (

Indexed as

CyclinD1Gene therapyPancreaticoduodenectomyPeriampullary carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38817999
PMCPMC11133249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.