ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024
Clinical outcomes in OPAT patients treated with ceftriaxone 4 g and ceftazidime 6 g extended interval dosing regimens.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission Following Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT).Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Delivery of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) in an Ever-Changing National Health Service (UK): Benefits, Barriers, and Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: New dosing regimens for ceftriaxone 4 g/24 hours and ceftazidime 3 g/12 hours are convenient for patients receiving OPAT. To date, these have not been clinically validated. Aim: To assess the tolerability, toxicity and effectiveness of once daily ceftriaxone (4 g) and 12 hourly ceftazidime regimens (3 g twice a day) in the OPAT setting. Patients and methods: From April 2018 until March 2023; demographic, clinical, microbiological and outcome data were collected on all adult patients discharged to a community-based OPAT team in East London. Results: There were 487 OPAT episodes. Fifty-three (10.9%) patients received ceftriaxone 4 g once a day and 20 (4.1%) ceftazidime 3 g twice a day. In the ceftriaxone group, the commonest conditions treated were orthopaedic, neurosurgical or diabetic foot infections. OPAT was used to expedite the discharge of 45 (84.9%) patients, the remainder were admission avoidance episodes. The commonest isolate causing infection was MSSA 23 (43.4%). There were no tolerability or toxicity episodes recorded. All patients were cured and bed days saved were 1266.In the smaller twice-daily ceftazidime cohort, seven (35%) patients were treated for necrotizing otitis externa, six (30%) for bronchiectasis and six (30%) for urinary tract infections. The commonest cause of infection was Conclusions: Regimens of ceftriaxone 4 g once a day and ceftazidime 3 g twice a day were well tolerated and highly effective. If widely adopted, these regimens will save OPAT and nursing time and enable more patients to be treated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.