ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Multi-mode adaptive control strategy for a lower limb rehabilitation robot.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart exoskeleton-assisted rehabilitation after fracture surgery: closed-loop control, personalized load management, and integrated telemonitoring.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- ChMER: an exoskeleton robot with active body weight support walker based on compliant actuation for children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A feature fusion network with spatial-temporal-enhanced strategy for the motor imagery of force intensity variation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different patients have different rehabilitation requirements. It is essential to ensure the safety and comfort of patients at different recovery stages during rehabilitation training. This study proposes a multi-mode adaptive control method to achieve a safe and compliant rehabilitation training strategy. First, patients' motion intention and motor ability are evaluated based on the average human-robot interaction force per task cycle. Second, three kinds of rehabilitation training modes-robot-dominant, patient-dominant, and safety-stop-are established, and the adaptive controller can dexterously switch between the three training modes. In the robot-dominant mode, based on the motion errors, the patient's motor ability, and motion intention, the controller can adaptively adjust its assistance level and impedance parameters to help patients complete rehabilitation tasks and encourage them to actively participate. In the patient-dominant mode, the controller only adjusts the training speed. When the trajectory error is too large, the controller switches to the safety-stop mode to ensure patient safety. The stabilities of the adaptive controller under three training modes are then proven using Lyapunov theory. Finally, the effectiveness of the multi-mode adaptive controller is verified by simulation results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.