Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817844›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Validation of gait analysis using smartphones: Reliability and validity.

Shuai Tao, Hao Zhang, Liwen Kong, Yan Sun, Jie Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Automatic Detection of Gait Perturbations With Everyday Wearable Technology.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shuai TaoCollege of Information Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Hao ZhangCollege of Information Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Liwen KongCollege of Information Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yan SunChina United Network Communications Co Ltd, Huaian, Jiangsu, China.
Jie ZhaoAffiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Department of Neurology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to validate the reliability and validity of gait analysis using smartphones in a controlled environment. Methods: Thirty healthy adults attached smartphones to the waist and thigh, while an inertial measurement unit was fixed at the shank as a reference device; each participant was asked to walk six gait cycles at self-selected low, normal, and high speeds. Thirty-five cerebral small vessel disease patients were recruited to attach the smartphone to the thigh, performing single-task (ST), cognitive dual-task (DT Results: The results from the healthy group indicate that, regardless of whether attached to the thigh or waist, the smartphones calculated gait parameters with good reliability (ICC Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using built-in smartphone sensors for gait analysis in a controlled environment.

Indexed as

Gait analysismHealthsensorsmartphonevalidation

Identifiers

PMID38817844
PMCPMC11138199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.