Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817828›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2024

Phenomenological characteristics of auto-induced cognitive trance and Mahorikatan

Charlotte Grégoire, Corine Sombrun, Philippe Lenaif, Nolwenn Marie, Aurélie Giovine, Marion Walter, Olivia Gosseries, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte GrégoireSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-6260
Corine SombrunTranceScience Research Institute, Rue de Monceau, 7bis, Paris 75008, France.
Philippe LenaifThe Call of Souls Project Foundation, Heid du Moulin, 9, Plainevaux 4122, Belgium.
Nolwenn MarieSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-8423
Aurélie GiovineInstitute for the Analysis of Change in Contemporary and Historical Societies, Faculty of Economic, Social and Political Sciences and Communication, Catholic University of Louvain, Place Montesquieu, 1, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium.
Marion WalterSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Olivia GosseriesSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Audrey VanhaudenhuyseSensation and Perception Research Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, Avenue de l'Hôpital, 1, Liège 4000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-9237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trance states include various practices characterized by a modulation of consciousness, but with their own specific characteristics and induction techniques. They have been very seldom scientifically studied, and their phenomenological similarities and differences are poorly documented. This paper will focus on two types of Western trances developed after the leaders were trained in traditional shamanic communities: the auto-induced cognitive trance (AICT) and the Mahorikatan

Indexed as

auto-induced cognitive tranceMahorikatan trancenon-ordinary state of consciousnessphenomenologyshamanic trance

Identifiers

PMID38817828
PMCPMC11138962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.