Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817811›Full record

ArticlemLife2023

A modified isooctane-based DNA extraction method from crude oil.

Armando Alibrandi, Rolando di Primio, Alexander Bartholomäus, Jens Kallmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Armando AlibrandiGFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Section Geomicrobiology Potsdam Germany.
Rolando di PrimioAker BP Lysaker Norway.
Alexander BartholomäusGFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Section Geomicrobiology Potsdam Germany.
Jens KallmeyerGFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience, Section Geomicrobiology Potsdam Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-1140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes from oil reservoirs shape petroleum composition through processes such as biodegradation or souring. Such processes are considered economically detrimental and might pose health and safety hazards. It is therefore crucial to understand the composition of a reservoir's microbial community and its metabolic capabilities. However, such analyses are hindered by difficulties in extracting DNA from such complex fluids as crude oil. Here, we present a novel DNA extraction method from oils with a wide American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity (density) range. We investigated the ability to extract cells from oils with different solvents and surfactants, the latter both nonionic and ionic. Furthermore, we evaluated three DNA extraction methods. Overall, the best DNA yields and the highest number of 16S rRNA reads were achieved with isooctane as a solvent, followed by an ionic surfactant treatment using sodium dodecyl sulfate and DNA extraction using the PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen). The final method was then applied to various oils from oil reservoirs collected in aseptic conditions. Despite the expected low cell density of 10

Indexed as

crude oilDNA extraction methodoil reservoir microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38817811
PMCPMC10989908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.