Surgical Decision Making for Mild-to-Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Purpose: The management of ulnar neuropathy remains unclear as there are neither consensus guidelines nor compelling data available to inform optimal treatment. Identifying patients in the mild-to-moderate group that would benefit most from surgery is challenging as their symptoms can be subtle and less debilitating. This study investigated predictors of surgical intervention among patients presenting with McGowan mild or moderate cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved study. Patients evaluated from March 2016 to July 2022 were included if they were diagnosed with McGowan mild or moderate CuTS and underwent concurrent electrodiagnostic and ultrasound evaluations. Patient demographics, symptom presentation, and clinical and diagnostic test findings were analyzed. Variables were analyzed using Student Results: Seventy-three patients and 103 elbows were identified. The mean age and body mass index were 51 years and 26.9, respectively. Most patients were men, right-handed, and unilaterally symptomatic in the dominant hand. Twenty-six elbows were surgically treated. Bivariable analyses by surgical treatment showed that patients who underwent surgery more often had positive electrodiagnostic findings including motor nerve conduction velocity <50 m/s and a >10 m/s conduction velocity difference across the forearm compared with elbow. Fifty-nine cases were categorized as electrodiagnostically normal. Of the electrodiagnostically normal cases, 29 had positive findings of CuTS on ultrasound. Logistic regression model showed that electrodiagnostically severe cases had 3.7 times higher odds of being surgically treated than normal counterparts (adjusted odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.11-12.6; Conclusions: Not many differences in objective findings identify patients who should receive operative treatment. In addition to test results, more subjective findings from patients such as patient-reported level of impairment may be able to bridge this gap in surgical decision making. Clinical relevance: This study contributes to treatment decision making for mild and moderate CuTS.