ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2024
Incidence and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Following Distal Radius Fractures: A TriNetX Analysis of 39,603 Patients.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are There Sex Differences in Wrist Velocity and Forearm Muscle Activity When Performing Identical Hand-Intensive Work Tasks?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Extended Flexor Carpi Radialis Approach for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Study.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common fractures and occur among all age groups. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a known sequela of DRFs, but its incidence is poorly understood. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of CTS following a DRF, with the hypothesis being that CTS occurs more commonly after nonsurgical treatment of a DRF. Methods: The TriNetX US Collaborative Network was queried for all patients diagnosed with DRFs from January 2016 to December 2022. Cohorts were defined by inclusion and exclusion of the procedure Current Procedural Terminology codes into surgical and nonsurgical groups and subsequent ICD-10 diagnosis codes of CTS. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences in management across the study period. Results: A total of 39,603 patients met inclusion with a diagnosis of a DRF. The incidence of CTS within one year of a DRF was 5.3%. Among all DRF cases, 10,279 (26%) patients underwent surgical treatment, whereas 29,324 (74%) patients underwent nonsurgical treatment. The incidence of CTS in the surgical group was 1194 (12%), whereas the incidence of CTS in the nonsurgical group was 915 (3%). Patients undergoing surgical treatment for a DRF had a 9% risk of developing CTS, whereas patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment had a 5% risk. Among all the patients having been diagnosed with CTS, 63% of those with an operatively treated DRF underwent surgical release, whereas 23% of those with a nonoperatively treated DRF underwent surgical release for CTS. Conclusions: Patients having undergone surgical treatment for DRF had a four times higher rate of developing CTS, compared with those having undergone nonsurgical treatment. Among patients who underwent surgical treatment of a DRF with the subsequent development of CTS, there was a nearly three times higher rate of surgical release of CTS. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.