Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817711›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Quantifying lung fissure integrity using a three-dimensional patch-based convolutional neural network on CT images for emphysema treatment planning.

Dallas K Tada, Pangyu Teng, Kalyani Vyapari, Ashley Banola, George Foster, Esteban Diaz, Grace Hyun J Kim, Jonathan G Goldin, Fereidoun Abtin, Michael McNitt-Gray and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dallas K TadaThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Pangyu TengThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-5339
Kalyani VyapariThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Ashley BanolaThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
George FosterThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Esteban DiazThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Grace Hyun J KimThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Jonathan G GoldinThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Fereidoun AbtinThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Michael McNitt-GrayThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-4613
Matthew S BrownThe University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Funding

Robust Clinical Translation of CT Imaging Biomarker in COPD for EBV Patient SelectionR01HL153964 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BROWN, MATTHEW S, GOLDIN, JONATHAN G · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of lung fissure integrity is required to determine whether emphysema patients have complete fissures and are candidates for endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy. We propose a deep learning (DL) approach to segment fissures using a three-dimensional patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) and quantitatively assess fissure integrity on CT to evaluate it in subjects with severe emphysema. Approach: From an anonymized image database of patients with severe emphysema, 129 CT scans were used. Lung lobe segmentations were performed to identify lobar regions, and the boundaries among these regions were used to construct approximate interlobar regions of interest (ROIs). The interlobar ROIs were annotated by expert image analysts to identify voxels where the fissure was present and create a reference ROI that excluded non-fissure voxels (where the fissure is incomplete). A CNN configured by nnU-Net was trained using 86 CT scans and their corresponding reference ROIs to segment the ROIs of left oblique fissure (LOF), right oblique fissure (ROF), and right horizontal fissure (RHF). For an independent test set of 43 cases, fissure integrity was quantified by mapping the segmented fissure ROI along the interlobar ROI. A fissure integrity score (FIS) was then calculated as the percentage of labeled fissure voxels divided by total voxels in the interlobar ROI. Predicted FIS (p-FIS) was quantified from the CNN output, and statistical analyses were performed comparing p-FIS and reference FIS (r-FIS). Results: The absolute percent error mean (±SD) between r-FIS and p-FIS for the test set was 4.0% ( Conclusions: A DL approach was developed to segment lung fissures on CT images and accurately quantify FIS. It has potential to assist in the identification of emphysema patients who would benefit from EBV treatment.

Indexed as

deep learningemphysemaendobronchial valvefissurefissure integrity scorennU-Net

Identifiers

PMID38817711
PMCPMC11135203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.