Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817674›Full record

ArticlemLife2022

Jin Yang, Jessica T Barra, Danny K Fung, Jue D Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Evolution of Heteroresistance via Small Colony Variants inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MOB rules: Antibiotic Exposure Reprograms Metabolism to MobilizebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin YangDepartment of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin Madison USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3442-5608
Jessica T BarraDepartment of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin Madison USA.
Danny K FungDepartment of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin Madison USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4002-7227
Jue D WangDepartment of Bacteriology University of Wisconsin Madison USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1503-170X

Funding

The critical roles of (p)ppGpp in homeostasis and antibiotic tolerance in Gram positive bacteriaR35GM127088 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Jue D. Wang · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics combat bacteria through their bacteriostatic (by growth inhibition) or bactericidal (by killing bacteria) action. Mechanistically, it has been proposed that bactericidal antibiotics trigger cellular damage, while bacteriostatic antibiotics suppress cellular metabolism. Here, we demonstrate how the difference between bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of the antibiotic chloramphenicol can be attributed to an antibiotic-induced bacterial protective response: the stringent response. Chloramphenicol targets the ribosome to inhibit the growth of the Gram-positive bacterium

Indexed as

antibiotic tolerancebactericidal antibioticbacteriostatic antibioticGTP(p)ppGpp

Identifiers

PMID38817674
PMCPMC10989873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.