Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817641›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods

Use of Framework Matrix and Thematic Coding Methods in Qualitative Analysis for mHealth: NIRUDAK Study Data.

Rochelle K Rosen, Monique Gainey, Sabiha Nasrin, Stephanie C Garbern, Ryan Lantini, Nour Elshabassi, Sufia Sultana, Tahmida Hasnin, Nur H Alam, Eric J Nelson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the real-world experience of abemaciclib treatment for HR +, HER2 - metastatic breast cancer-a qualitative analysis of the IMPACTOR study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rochelle K RosenCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
Monique GaineyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
Sabiha NasrinNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Stephanie C GarbernDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Ryan LantiniCenter for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.
Nour ElshabassiSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Sufia SultanaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tahmida HasninNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nur H AlamNutrition and Clinical Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Eric J NelsonEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Adam C LevineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.

Funding

External Validation and Implementation of a Novel Mobile Health Application for Acute Diarrhea Management across the LifespanR01DK116163 · NIDDK · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI Adam Carl Levine · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
Emerging Infectious Disease Scholars at Brown UniversityR25AI140490 · NIAID · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Silvia Shinpei Chiang · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R25 AI140490NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Framework Matrix Analysis (FMA) and Applied Thematic Analysis (ATA) are qualitative methods that have not been as widely used/cited compared to content analysis or grounded theory. This paper compares methods of FMA with ATA for mobile health (mHealth) research. The same qualitative data were analyzed separately, using each methodology. The methods, utility, and results of each are compared, and recommendations made for their effective use. Methods: Formative qualitative data were collected in eight focus group discussions with physicians and nurses from three hospitals in Bangladesh. Focus groups were conducted via video conference in the local language, Bangla, and audio recorded. Audio recordings were used to complete a FMA of participants' opinions about key features of a novel mHealth application (app) designed to support clinical management in patients with acute diarrhea. The resulting framework matrix was shared with the app design team and used to guide iterative development of the product for a validation study of the app. Subsequently, focus group audio recordings were transcribed in Bangla then translated into English for ATA; transcripts and codes were entered into NVivo qualitative analysis software. Code summaries and thematic memos explored the clinical utility of the mHealth app including clinicians' attitudes about using this decision support tool. Results: Each of the two methods contributes differently to the research goal and have different implications for an mHealth research timeline. Recommendations for the effective use of each method in app development include: using FMA for data reduction where specific outcomes are needed to make programming and design decisions and using ATA to capture the more nuanced issues that guide use, product implementation, training, and workflow. Conclusions: By describing how both analytical methods were used in this context, this paper provides guidance and an illustration for use of these two methods, specifically in mHealth design.

Indexed as

framework matrixmHealthqualitative data analysisthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID38817641
PMCPMC11138313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.