ReviewCureus2024
The Influence of Symptomatic Status on Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Complications in Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choledocholithiasis presents variably, with some patients remaining asymptomatic, complicating decisions regarding the timing and necessity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study represents the first meta-analysis assessing the impact of symptomatic status on post-ERCP complications and provides critical data to optimize treatment strategies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar through February 2024, focusing on comparing ERCP outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with choledocholithiasis. Seven studies were included from an initial pool of 1,200 articles screened. The analysis revealed that asymptomatic patients exhibited a significantly higher overall complication rate (17.4% vs. 6.6%), including a threefold increase in the risk of developing complications overall (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 2.26-4.03) and specifically post-ERCP pancreatitis (OR: 3.62; 95% CI: 2.63-4.99). Perforation and procedural durations were also notably higher among asymptomatic individuals. Subgroup analyses highlighted prolonged cannulation times and the use of precut sphincterotomy as potential influential factors. These findings challenge the current practice that does not differentiate based on symptomatic status and suggest a need for more tailored approaches in managing asymptomatic individuals to minimize risks associated with ERCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.