ArticleCureus2024
Awareness of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Women Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), diagnosed during pregnancy, can harm both mothers and neonates. GDM awareness among women varies among various countries. Understanding the level of awareness is vital for designing effective health interventions. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate GDM awareness among married females at primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) in Qassim, Saudi Arabia, focusing on knowledge regarding adverse maternal and fetal outcomes of GDM. Methods An observational cross-sectional study was conducted among married females at PHCCs in Qassim, from June 2023 to October 2023. A two-stage cluster sampling method was used. Four PHCCs were selected in the first stage, and study participants were selected from these centers in the second stage. A self-administered questionnaire was used. Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 23; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis. Results Of the 270 participants, the majority (72.2%) demonstrated 'poor' knowledge about GDM adverse outcomes for both mothers and neonates, 17.8% demonstrated a 'fair' level, and only 10% displayed a 'good' knowledge. Participants' educational level, personal history of diabetes, and age were associated with knowledge levels. Awareness of specific outcomes related to GDM, both maternal and neonatal, varied among participants. Information on GDM was mainly obtained from mass media and personal networks, while healthcare providers were reported as the least common source. Conclusion Based on the results of our study, we conclude that educational interventions, especially involving healthcare providers, are essential to improve awareness about GDM adverse outcomes. Strategies involving educational sessions by healthcare providers and health education materials at PHCCs can improve awareness leading to effective management of GDM and improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.