ArticleCureus2024
Prevalence and Causes of Stigmatization Among Patients With Chronic Skin Diseases in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric Evaluation of Patients With Vitiligo.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin diseases can lead to stigmatization with negative consequences for patients' quality of life and mental health.
aimThe aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of stigmatization experienced by patients with vitiligo, psoriasis, acne, rosacea, or atopic dermatitis and to assess the relationships between the level of stigmatization and patient characteristics.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included adult patients with vitiligo, psoriasis, acne, rosacea, or atopic dermatitis attending the dermatology clinics of various general hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Stigma levels were assessed using the six-item Stigma Scale.
resultsThe prevalence of stigmatization was 90.4% among the 280 patients included. Multiple regression analyses revealed the factors that independently and significantly increased the level of stigmatization. These included male gender (B = 4.300, 95%CI 3.407-5.192, P <0.001), positive family history of skin conditions (B = 2.267, 95%CI 1.139-3.395, P <0.001), number of skin diseases (B = 2.357, 95%CI 0.998-3.716, P = 0.001), and presence of facial lesions (B = 2.455, 95%CI 1.206-3.705, P<0.001).
conclusionsThe prevalence of stigmatization is high among patients with chronic skin diseases in Saudi Arabia. Identifying patients at risk for high levels of stigmatization may allow them to be provided with appropriate social and psychological support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.