Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817455›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Initial Experiences of Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in a Tertiary Oncology Center: An Analysis of 142 Cases.

Mehmet Duvarcı, Oğuzhan Ceylan, Murat Beyatlı, Tuncel Uzel, Erdem Öztürk, Nurullah Hamidi, Halil Başar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehmet DuvarcıUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Oğuzhan CeylanUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Murat BeyatlıUrology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, TUR.
Tuncel UzelUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Erdem ÖztürkUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Nurullah HamidiUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Halil BaşarUrology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKidney tumors have an important place among urological malignancies. The increased utilization of imaging methods has led to a rise in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnoses, albeit with declining mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. Radical nephrectomy remains the gold standard treatment. The aim of this study was to share a tertiary oncology hospital's initial experiences with laparoscopic nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study analyzes data from patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy, focusing on demographic characteristics, tumor features, and operative outcomes. Information regarding age, gender, tumor size, operative details, and pathology results was collected and analyzed.

resultsOne hundred forty-two patients were included in the study; 69 (48.60%) were female and 73 (51.40%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 57.11 ± 12.6 years, with tumors primarily located on the left kidney (52.80%). The mean tumor size was 53.01 ± 24.01 mm. Intraoperative complications included the need for conversion to open surgery in five cases and vascular, pneumothorax, or duodenal injuries in a subset of patients. However, postoperative complications, such as sepsis or mortality, were not observed. DISCUSSION: Despite an initial learning curve associated with longer operation times, laparoscopic techniques offer benefits, including reduced blood loss, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes. Histologically, clear cell RCC was the most common tumor type encountered. This study underscores the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, advocating for its widespread adoption while emphasizing the importance of surgeon experience and patient selection in optimizing outcomes.

Indexed as

kidney tumorlaparoscopic nephrectomylaparoscopic surgerylaparoscopynephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID38817455
PMCPMC11139056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.