Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2024

Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of

Yan Li, Chonghong Xie, Zhijie Zhang, Jianhua Liu, Hui Chang, Yong Liu, Xiaosong Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multicenter Surveillance ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan Li *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Chonghong Xie *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhijie ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jianhua LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hui ChangCenter of Clinical Laboratory and Quality Control, Health Service Center of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiaosong QinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The increasing incidence of Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has posed great challenges for the clinical anti-infective treatment. Here, we describe the molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of K. pneumoniae and CRKP isolates from hospitalized patients in different regions of China. Methods: A total of 219 K. pneumoniae isolates from 26 hospitals in 19 provinces of China were collected during 2019-2020. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests, multilocus sequence typing were performed, antimicrobial resistance genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antimicrobial resistance profiles were compared between different groups. Results: The resistance rates of K. pneumoniae isolates to imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem were 20.1%, 20.1%, and 22.4%, respectively. A total of 45 CRKP isolates were identified. There was a significant difference in antimicrobial resistance between 45 CRKP and 174 carbapenem-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP) strains, and the CRKP isolates were characterized by the multiple-drug resistance phenotype.There were regional differences among antimicrobial resistance rates of K. pneumoniae to cefazolin, chloramphenicol, and sulfamethoxazole,which were lower in the northwest than those in north and south of China.The mostcommon sequence type (ST) was ST11 (66.7% of the strains). In addition, we detected 13 other STs. There were differences between ST11 and non-ST11 isolates in the resistance rate to amikacin, gentamicin, latamoxef, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, aztreonam, nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and ceftazidime/avibactam. In terms of molecular resistance mechanisms, the majority of the CRKP strains (71.1%, 32/45) harbored blaKPC-2, followed by blaNDM (22.2%, 10/45). Strains harboring blaKPC or blaNDM genes showed different sensitivities to some antibiotics. Conclusion: Our analysis emphasizes the importance of surveilling carbapenem-resistant determinants and analyzing their molecular characteristics for better management of antimicrobial agents in clinical use.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMultilocus Sequence TypingAdultAgedCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsChinaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsantimicrobial resistancecarbapenem-resistantepidemiologyKlebsiella pneumoniaesequence type

Identifiers

PMID38817445
PMCPMC11137252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.