ReviewClinical hematology international2024
Outpatient CAR T-Cell Therapy as Standard of Care: Current Perspectives and Considerations.
Review in Clinical hematology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of axicabtagene ciloleucel in the outpatient setting: primary analysis of prospective trial.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Trial
- Blinatumomab administration in the outpatient setting: Safety and health care utilization.Cancer · 2026Article
- A roadmap for establishing institutional readiness for cellular therapies targeting solid tumours and autoimmune diseases.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- HosTIL territory: mapping the landscape of toxicity in TIL therapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Real-world outcomes after CAR T versus standard therapy in third-line or later relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma in the United States.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Optimizing ciltacabtagene autoleucel outcomes: real-world experience and best practices from a single academic center.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance in Cell and Gene Therapy: Evolving Challenges in Risk Management and Long-Term Follow-Up.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Health care resource utilization and costs of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies across different settings of care: A real-world data analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Measure selection for an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for CAR T-cell therapy patients: a modified Delphi consensus study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Outpatient axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: ZUMA-24 primary analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- The current socioeconomic and regulatory landscape of immune effector cell therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Autologous stem cell transplantation meets CAR-T therapy: A synergistic strategy for B-cell lymphoma.Cell transplantationReview
- Immunotherapy Landscape for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) in Malaysia: A Qualitative Study Among Healthcare Professionals From Two National Referral Centres.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has altered the treatment landscape of several hematologic malignancies. Until recently, most CAR-T infusions have been administered in the inpatient setting, due to their toxicity profile. However, the advent of new product constructs, as well as improved detection and management of adverse effects, have greatly increased the safety in administering these therapies. CAR-T indications continue to expand, and inpatient administration is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization and overall cost. Therefore, transitioning CAR-T administration to the outpatient setting has been of great interest in an effort to improve access, reduce financial burden, and improve patient satisfaction. Establishment of a successful outpatient CAR-T requires several components, including a multidisciplinary cellular therapy team and an outpatient center with appropriate clinical space and personnel. Additionally, clear criteria for outpatient administration eligibility and for inpatient admission with pathways for prompt toxicity evaluation and admission, and toxicity management guidelines should be implemented. Education about CAR-T therapy and its associated toxicities is imperative for all clinical staff, as well as patients and their caregivers. Finally, rigorous financial planning and close collaboration with payers to ensure equitable access, while effectively managing cost, are essential to program success and sustainability. This review provides a summary of currently published experiences, as well as expert opinion regarding implementation of an outpatient CAR-T program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.