Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38817000›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2024

Anticipating Tomorrow: Tailoring Parkinson's Symptomatic Therapy Using Predictors of Outcome.

Ronald B Postuma, Daniel Weintraub, Tanya Simuni, Mayela Rodríguez-Violante, Albert F G Leentjens, Michele T Hu, Alberto J Espay, Roberto Erro, Kathy Dujardin, Nicolaas I Bohnen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Clinicians' viewpoints on current paradigms of care and research in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  5. What can we do to enhance cognitive care in Parkinson's disease?Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ronald B PostumaDepartment of Neurology, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6468-4734
Daniel WeintraubDepartments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tanya SimuniFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Mayela Rodríguez-ViolanteMovement Disorders Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-9941
Albert F G LeentjensDepartment of Psychiatry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-571X
Michele T HuNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology Department, Oxford University and John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6382-5841
Alberto J EspayJames J. and Joan A. Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-136X
Roberto ErroDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience Section, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-7419
Kathy DujardinNeurology and Movement Disorders Department, University of Lille, Inserm, Lille Neurosciences and Cognition, CHU-Lille, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0110-574X
Nicolaas I BohnenDepartments of Radiology and Neurology, University of Michigan, University of Michigan Udall Center, Ann Arbor VAMC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-6414
Daniela BergDepartment of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
Tiago A MestreDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The University of Ottawa Brain and Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6973-7479
Connie MarrasEdmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and the Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough research into Parkinson's disease (PD) subtypes and outcome predictions has continued to advance, recommendations for using outcome prediction to guide current treatment decisions remain sparse.

objectivesTo provide expert opinion-based recommendations for individually tailored PD symptomatic treatment based on knowledge of risk prediction and subtypes.

methodsUsing a modified Delphi approach, members of the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Task Force on PD subtypes generated a series of general recommendations around the question: "Using what you know about genetic/biological/clinical subtypes (or any individual-level predictors of outcome), what advice would you give for selecting symptomatic treatments for an individual patient now, based on what their subtype or individual characteristics predict about their future disease course?" After four iterations and revisions, those recommendations with over 75% endorsement were adopted.

resultsA total of 19 recommendations were endorsed by a group of 13 panelists. The recommendations primarily centered around two themes: (1) incorporating future risk of cognitive impairment into current treatment plans; and (2) identifying future symptom clusters that might be forestalled with a single medication.

conclusionsThese recommendations provide clinicians with a framework for integrating future outcomes into patient-specific treatment choices. They are not prescriptive guidelines, but adaptable suggestions, which should be tailored to each individual. They are to be considered as a first step of a process that will continue to evolve as additional stakeholders provide new insights and as new information becomes available. As individualized risk prediction advances, the path to better tailored treatment regimens will become clearer.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueParkinson DiseaseHumansTreatment OutcomeParkinson's diseasepersonalized medicinepredictionsubtypes, therapy

Identifiers

PMID38817000
PMCPMC11329576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.