Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816848›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Exploring the tradeoff between data privacy and utility with a clinical data analysis use case.

Eunyoung Im, Hyeoneui Kim, Hyungbok Lee, Xiaoqian Jiang, Ju Han Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Anonymization of general practitioners' electronic medical records in two research datasets].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eunyoung ImCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyeoneui KimCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. ifilgood@snu.ac.kr.
Hyungbok LeeCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA.
Ju Han KimSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare 800-20210627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecuring adequate data privacy is critical for the productive utilization of data. De-identification, involving masking or replacing specific values in a dataset, could damage the dataset's utility. However, finding a reasonable balance between data privacy and utility is not straightforward. Nonetheless, few studies investigated how data de-identification efforts affect data analysis results. This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of different de-identification methods on a dataset's utility with a clinical analytic use case and assess the feasibility of finding a workable tradeoff between data privacy and utility.

methodsPredictive modeling of emergency department length of stay was used as a data analysis use case. A logistic regression model was developed with 1155 patient cases extracted from a clinical data warehouse of an academic medical center located in Seoul, South Korea. Nineteen de-identified datasets were generated based on various de-identification configurations using ARX, an open-source software for anonymizing sensitive personal data. The variable distributions and prediction results were compared between the de-identified datasets and the original dataset. We examined the association between data privacy and utility to determine whether it is feasible to identify a viable tradeoff between the two.

resultsAll 19 de-identification scenarios significantly decreased re-identification risk. Nevertheless, the de-identification processes resulted in record suppression and complete masking of variables used as predictors, thereby compromising dataset utility. A significant correlation was observed only between the re-identification reduction rates and the ARX utility scores.

conclusionsAs the importance of health data analysis increases, so does the need for effective privacy protection methods. While existing guidelines provide a basis for de-identifying datasets, achieving a balance between high privacy and utility is a complex task that requires understanding the data's intended use and involving input from data users. This approach could help find a suitable compromise between data privacy and utility.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityData AnonymizationEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLength of StayMaleRepublic of KoreaARX toolClinical data analysisData de-identificationData privacyData utility

Identifiers

PMID38816848
PMCPMC11137882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.