ArticleBMC medical education2024
Enhancing AI competence in health management: students' experiences with ChatGPT as a learning Tool.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for social innovation in health education: promoting health literacy through personalized ai-driven learning tools - a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of generative AI on health professional education: A systematic review in the context of student learning.Medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Medical students' attitudes, usage patterns, and associated factors with DeepSeek adoption in education: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Effects of ChatGPT-generated immediate feedback integrated into VR-based OSCEs on nursing students' performance: a randomized crossover study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of ChatGPT in artificial intelligence literacy: a study on usage and acceptance among nursing students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The mediating role of knowledge conversion between digital literacy and scientific creativity among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Responsible AI readiness in a humanitarian and development ecosystem: an exploratory case study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI and algorithmic literacy among health workers: a scoping review through a digital health literacy lens.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Trial Files: Leveraging large language models to summarize practice-changing clinical trials for clinicians.PloS one · 2026Article
- Relationships between ChatGPT use with self-directed learning and critical thinking among school and university nurses in Taiwan.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Virtual reality vs. Manikin based training on emergency life saving basic rescue skills: a summative evaluation.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The Collapse of Brain Clearance: Glymphatic-Venous Failure, Aquaporin-4 Breakdown, and AI-Empowered Precision Neurotherapeutics in Intracranial Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Health management students' perceived soft skills acquisition and university commitment.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Open- and closed-source LLMs in medical and engineering education.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Embracing AI in academia: A mixed methods study of nursing students' and educators' perspectives on using ChatGPT.PloS one · 2025Article
- Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT's transition from textbooks to terabytes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe healthcare industry has had to adapt to significant shifts caused by technological advancements, demographic changes, economic pressures, and political dynamics. These factors are reshaping the complex ecosystem in which healthcare organizations operate and have forced them to modify their operations in response to the rapidly evolving landscape. The increase in automation and the growing importance of digital and virtual environments are the key drivers necessitating this change. In the healthcare sector in particular, processes of change, including the incorporation of artificial intelligent language models like ChatGPT into daily life, necessitate a reevaluation of digital literacy skills.
methodsThis study proposes a novel pedagogical framework that integrates problem-based learning with the use of ChatGPT for undergraduate healthcare management students, while qualitatively exploring the students' experiences with this technology through a thematic analysis of the reflective journals of 65 students.
resultsThrough the data analysis, the researcher identified five main categories: (1) Use of Literacy Skills; (2) User Experiences with ChatGPT; (3) ChatGPT Information Credibility; (4) Challenges and Barriers when Working with ChatGPT; (5) Mastering ChatGPT-Prompting Competencies. The findings show that incorporating digital tools, and particularly ChatGPT, in medical education has a positive impact on students' digital literacy and on AI Literacy skills.
conclusionsThe results underscore the evolving nature of these skills in an AI-integrated educational environment and offer valuable insights into students' perceptions and experiences. The study contributes to the broader discourse about the need for updated AI literacy skills in medical education from the early stages of education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.