Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816634›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2024

Comparative analysis of intragroup intermale relationships: a study of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Democratic Republic of Congo and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Kalinzu Forest Reserve, Uganda.

Shohei Shibata, Takeshi Furuichi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shohei ShibataWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 41-2, Kanrin, Inuyama, Aichi, 484-8506, Japan. shibata.shohei.d12@kyoto-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3605-2502
Takeshi FuruichiWildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, 41-2, Kanrin, Inuyama, Aichi, 484-8506, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for JSPS FellowsJapan Society for the Promotion of Science JSPS Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research 16H02753Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JSPS Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research 25304019Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JSPS Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research 26257408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) share a multi-male/multi-female societal organization and form male-philopatric groups, disparities in terms of male aggression and stability of temporary parties are thought to exist among them. However, existing research in bonobos has mainly focused on the high social status, prolonged receptivity, and characteristic sexual behaviors of females, leaving the behaviors of males understudied. Moreover, prior comparative studies on Pan suffer from methodological inconsistencies. This study addresses these gaps by employing a uniform observation method to explore party attendance and aggressive interactions among male bonobos in Wamba and male chimpanzees in Kalinzu. Unlike male chimpanzees, which exhibit dispersion in the absence of receptive females in the group, male bonobos showed a lesser degree of such dispersion. Although the overall frequency of aggressive interactions per observation unit did not significantly differ between the two species, the nature of these interactions varied. Notably, severe aggressive behaviors such as physical confrontations among adult males were absent in bonobos, with most aggression occurring between the sons of the two highest-ranking females. Additionally, in bonobos, females actively engaged in polyadic aggressive behavior as aggressors, while all instances of coalitionary aggression in chimpanzees originated from male aggressors. These findings underscore the substantial impact of female behaviors on the observed distinctions in male aggressive interactions between the two species.

Indexed as

AggressionPan paniscusPan troglodytesSocial BehaviorAnimalsDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleMaleUgandaAggressionDominance rankFission–fusion dynamicsKalinzu Forest ReservePan paniscusPan troglodytesParty sizeWamba

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.