Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816629›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review.

Leena Tuominen, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Jenna Poraharju, Daniela Cabutto, Carme Carrion, Leeni Lehtiö, Sónia Moretó, Minna Stolt, Virpi Sulosaari, Heli Virtanen

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Effect of a digital tool on breast cancer specific health-related quality of life and psychological distress: secondary results from the ADAPT study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leena TuominenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. leetuo@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-7572
Helena Leino-KilpiUniversity of Turku FI and Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, University of Turku FI, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. helena.leino-kilpi@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-971X
Jenna PoraharjuDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Daniela CabuttoeHealth Lab Research Group, School of Health Sciences and eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme CarrioneHealth Lab Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences Studies, E-Health Center, School of Health Sciences and eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Leeni LehtiöTurku University Library, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-7729
Sónia MoretóeHealth Lab Research Group, School of Health Sciences and eHealth Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Minna StoltDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1845-9800
Virpi SulosaariHealth and Well-Being, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.
Heli VirtanenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1801-549X

Funding

The European Union or the Health and Digital Executive Agency 101101253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify and synthesise interactive digital tools used to support the empowerment of people with cancer and the outcomes of these tools.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Eric, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases in May 2023. Inclusion criteria were patient empowerment as an outcome supported by interactive digital tools expressed in study goal, methods or results, peer-reviewed studies published since 2010 in cancer care. Narrative synthesis was applied, and the quality of the studies was assessed following Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.

resultsOut of 1571 records screened, 39 studies published in 2011-2022 with RCT (17), single-arm trial (15), quasi-experimental (1), and qualitative designs (6) were included. A total of 30 interactive digital tools were identified to support empowerment (4) and related aspects, such as self-management (2), coping (4), patient activation (9), and self-efficacy (19). Significant positive effects were found on empowerment (1), self-management (1), coping (1), patient activation (2), and self-efficacy (10). Patient experiences were positive. Interactivity occurred with the tool itself (22), peers (7), or nurses (7), physicians (2), psychologists, (2) or social workers (1).

conclusionInteractive digital tools have been developed extensively in recent years, varying in terms of content and methodology, favouring feasibility and pilot designs. In all of the tools, people with cancer are either active or recipients of information. The research evidence indicates positive outcomes for patient empowerment through interactive digital tools. Thus, even though promising, there still is need for further testing of the tools.

Indexed as

EmpowermentNeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPatient ParticipationSelf EfficacySelf-ManagementCancer careEmpowermentInteractive digital toolOncologyPeople with cancer

Identifiers

PMID38816629
PMCPMC11139693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.