Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Housekeeping protein-coding genes interrogated with tissue and individual variations.

Kuo-Feng Tung, Chao-Yu Pan, Wen-Chang Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kuo-Feng TungInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chao-Yu PanInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Wen-Chang LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan, R.O.C.. wenlin@ibms.sinica.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Housekeeping protein-coding genes are stably expressed genes in cells and tissues that are thought to be engaged in fundamental cellular biological functions. They are often utilized as normalization references in molecular biology research and are especially important in integrated bioinformatic investigations. Prior studies have examined human housekeeping protein-coding genes by analyzing various gene expression datasets. The inclusion of different tissue types significantly impacted the discovery of housekeeping genes. In this report, we investigated particularly individual human subject expression differences in protein-coding genes across different tissue types. We used GTEx V8 gene expression datasets obtained from more than 16,000 human normal tissue samples. Furthermore, the Gini index is utilized to investigate the expression variations of protein-coding genes between tissue and individual donor subjects. Housekeeping protein-coding genes found using Gini index profiles may vary depending on the tissue subtypes investigated, particularly given the diverse sample size collections across the GTEx tissue subtypes. We subsequently selected major tissues and identified subsets of housekeeping genes with stable expression levels among human donors within those tissues. In this work, we provide alternative sets of housekeeping protein-coding genes that show more consistent expression patterns in human subjects across major solid organs. Weblink: https://hpsv.ibms.sinica.edu.tw .

Indexed as

Genes, EssentialComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHumansOrgan SpecificityGini indexGTEx projectHousekeeping genesNext-generation sequencingProtein-coding gene

Identifiers

PMID38816574
PMCPMC11139953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.