ReviewNature protocols2024
Integrating genome-wide CRISPR screens and in silico drug profiling for targeted antidote development.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inducible CRISPR-Cas9 screening platform to interrogate non-proliferative cellular states.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Posaconazole mitigates α-amanitin-induced liver injury by inhibiting STT3B-mediated glycosylation and cellular uptake.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis based on CRISPR screen identifies apilimod as a potential therapeutic agent for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury treatment.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Screening Highlights PFKFB3 Gene as a Major Contributor to 5-Fluorouracil Resistance in Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous toxins threaten humans, but specific antidotes are unavailable for most of them. Although CRISPR screening has aided the discovery of the mechanisms of some toxins, developing targeted antidotes remains a significant challenge. Recently, we established a systematic framework to develop antidotes by combining the identification of novel drug targets by using a genome-wide CRISPR screen with a virtual screen of drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of toxin mechanisms at the whole-genome level and facilitates the identification of promising antidote drugs targeting specific molecules. Here, we present step-by-step instructions for executing genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens of toxins in HAP1 cells. We also provide detailed guidance for conducting an in silico drug screen and an in vivo drug validation. By using this protocol, it takes ~4 weeks to perform the genome-scale screen, 4 weeks for sequencing and data analysis, 4 weeks to validate candidate genes, 1 week for the virtual screen and 2 weeks for in vitro drug validation. This framework has the potential to accelerate the development of antidotes for a wide range of toxins and can rapidly identify promising drug candidates that are already known to be safe and effective. This could lead to the development of new antidotes much more quickly than traditional methods, protecting lives from diverse toxins and advancing human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38816517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.