Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816505›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2024

Uncertainty in Environmental Micropollutant Modeling.

Heidi Ahkola, Niina Kotamäki, Eero Siivola, Jussi Tiira, Stefano Imoscopi, Matteo Riva, Ulas Tezel, Janne Juntunen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heidi AhkolaFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland. heidi.ahkola@syke.fi.
Niina KotamäkiFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero SiivolaFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Jussi TiiraFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
Stefano ImoscopiIDSIA, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Matteo RivaIndependent Researcher. Work Carried Out While Employed at IDSIA, USI, Lugano, Switzerland.
Ulas TezelInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Hisar Campus, Bebek, Istanbul, 34342, Turkey.
Janne JuntunenFinnish Environment Institute (Syke), Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

CHIST-ERA CHIST-ERA-19-CES-005Research Council of Finland 344740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water pollution policies have been enacted across the globe to minimize the environmental risks posed by micropollutants (MPs). For regulative institutions to be able to ensure the realization of environmental objectives, they need information on the environmental fate of MPs. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to further improve environmental decision-making, which heavily relies on scientific data. Use of mathematical and computational modeling in environmental permit processes for water construction activities has increased. Uncertainty of input data considers several steps from sampling and analysis to physico-chemical characteristics of MP. Machine learning (ML) methods are an emerging technique in this field. ML techniques might become more crucial for MP modeling as the amount of data is constantly increasing and the emerging new ML approaches and applications are developed. It seems that both modeling strategies, traditional and ML, use quite similar methods to obtain uncertainties. Process based models cannot consider all known and relevant processes, making the comprehensive estimation of uncertainty challenging. Problems in a comprehensive uncertainty analysis within ML approach are even greater. For both approaches generic and common method seems to be more useful in a practice than those emerging from ab initio. The implementation of the modeling results, including uncertainty and the precautionary principle, should be researched more deeply to achieve a reliable estimation of the effect of an action on the chemical and ecological status of an environment without underestimating or overestimating the risk. The prevailing uncertainties need to be identified and acknowledged and if possible, reduced. This paper provides an overview of different aspects that concern the topic of uncertainty in MP modeling.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalEnvironmental MonitoringMachine LearningUncertaintyWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PollutionWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID38816505
PMCPMC11227446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.