Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Machine learning-based diagnostic prediction of IgA nephropathy: model development and validation study.

Ryunosuke Noda, Daisuke Ichikawa, Yugo Shibagaki

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryunosuke NodaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan. nodaryu00@gmail.com.
Daisuke IchikawaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Yugo ShibagakiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.

Funding

Tateishi Science and Technology Foundation 2237009Wellcome Trust 202201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IgA nephropathy progresses to kidney failure, making early detection important. However, definitive diagnosis depends on invasive kidney biopsy. This study aimed to develop non-invasive prediction models for IgA nephropathy using machine learning. We collected retrospective data on demographic characteristics, blood tests, and urine tests of the patients who underwent kidney biopsy. The dataset was divided into derivation and validation cohorts, with temporal validation. We employed five machine learning models-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), LightGBM, Random Forest, Artificial Neural Networks, and 1 Dimentional-Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN)-and logistic regression, evaluating performance via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and explored variable importance through SHapley Additive exPlanations method. The study included 1268 participants, with 353 (28%) diagnosed with IgA nephropathy. In the derivation cohort, LightGBM achieved the highest AUROC of 0.913 (95% CI 0.906-0.919), significantly higher than logistic regression, Artificial Neural Network, and 1D-CNN, not significantly different from XGBoost and Random Forest. In the validation cohort, XGBoost demonstrated the highest AUROC of 0.894 (95% CI 0.850-0.935), maintaining its robust performance. Key predictors identified were age, serum albumin, IgA/C3, and urine red blood cells, aligning with existing clinical insights. Machine learning can be a valuable non-invasive tool for IgA nephropathy.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, IGAMachine LearningAdultBiopsyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesROC CurveArtificial intelligenceGlomerulonephritisIgA nephropathyKidney biopsyMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38816457
PMCPMC11139869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.