Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816454›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

In vivo trial of bioresorbable mesh cages contained bone graft granules in rabbit femoral bone defects.

Toshiki Yanagisawa, Koichiro Hayashi, Akira Tsuchiya, Ryo Kishida, Kunio Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bone augmentation using bioresorbable mesh domes containing bone graft granules.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toshiki YanagisawaDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. yanagisawa@dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Koichiro HayashiDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Akira TsuchiyaDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Ryo KishidaDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kunio IshikawaDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone graft granules implanted in bone defects come into physical contact with the host bone and form interconnected porous structure. However, there exists an accidental displacement of granules to unintended locations and leakage of granules from bone defects. Although covering the defect with a barrier membrane prevents granule emanation, this procedure is troublesome. To resolve these problems, we fabricated bioresorbable mesh cages (BRMc) in this study. Bone graft granules composed of carbonate apatite alone (Gr) and bioresorbable mesh cages (BRMc/Gr) introduced the bone graft granules and were implanted into the bone defect in the rabbit femur. Micro-computed tomography and histological analysis were conducted at 4 and 12 weeks after implantation. Osteoprogenitors in the bloodstream from the host bone passed through the pores of BRMc, penetrated the porous structure of graft granules, and might interact with individual granules. Then bone remodeling could progress actively and new bone was formed. The new bone formation was similar to the host bone at 12 weeks and there were minimal signs of local tissue inflammation. BRMc/Gr could reduce the risk of unwanted new bone formation occurring due to loss of granules from the bone defects compared with Gr because BRMc enclosed granules and prevent granules leakage from bone defects and BRMc could not induce unfavorable effects to forme new bone. Additionally, BRMc/Gr could keep granules assembled in one place, avoid displacement of granules to unintended locations, and carry easily. These results demonstrated that BRMc/Gr was effective in bone regeneration and improved clinical handling.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationFemurX-Ray MicrotomographyAbsorbable ImplantsAnimalsBone RegenerationOsteogenesisRabbits

Identifiers

PMID38816454
PMCPMC11139951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.