Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816064›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2024

Predictors for severe persisting pain in rheumatoid arthritis are associated with pain origin and appraisal of pain.

Christoph Baerwald, Edgar Stemmler, Sixten Gnüchtel, Katharina Jeromin, Björn Fritz, Michael Bernateck, Daniela Adolf, Peter C Taylor, Ralf Baron

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct Effects of the Janus Kinase Inhibitor Baricitinib on Sensory Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christoph BaerwaldZentrum für Seltene Erkrankungen, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany cbaerwald@outlook.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1406-3024
Edgar StemmlerAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Sixten GnüchtelAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Katharina JerominAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Björn FritzAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Michael BernateckCenter for Rheumatology & Pain-Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Daniela AdolfStatConsult GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany.
Peter C TaylorNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-6167
Ralf BaronDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with severe persisting pain and to identify predictive factors despite treatment-controlled disease activity.

methodsThis prospective multicentre study included outpatients with RA scheduled for escalation of anti-inflammatory treatment due to active disease and severe pain (Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)>3.2 and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)>50). At week 24, patients were stratified into reference group (DAS28 improvement>1.2 or DAS28≤3.2 and VAS pain score<50), non-responders (DAS28 improvement≤1.2 and DAS28>3.2, regardless of VAS pain score) and persisting pain group (DAS28 improvement>1.2 or DAS28≤3.2 and VAS pain score≥50). The former two subgroups ended the study at week 24. The latter continued until week 48. Demographic data, DAS28-C reactive protein, VAS for pain, painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) to identify neuropathic pain (NeP) and the Pain Catastrophising Scale were assessed and tested for relation to persisting pain.

resultsOf 567 patients, 337 (59.4%) were classified as reference group, 102 (18.0%) as non-responders and 128 (22.6%) as patients with persisting pain. 21 (8.8%) responders, 28 (35.0%) non-responders and 27 (26.5%) persisting pain patients tested positive for NeP at week 24. Pain catastrophising (p=0.002) and number of tender joints (p=0.004) were positively associated with persisting pain at week 24. Baseline PD-Q was not related to subsequent persisting pain.

conclusionsPersisting and non-nociceptive pain occur frequently in RA. Besides the potential involvement of NeP, pain catastrophising and a higher number of tender joints coincide with persisting pain.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedArthralgiaCatastrophizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaProspective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePainRheumatoid ArthritisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38816064
PMCPMC11503054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.