Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38816056›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Understanding the interaction between support and social participation for people with physical disabilities: a scoping review protocol.

Rebecca Evans, Jacinta Douglas, Di Winkler, Lee Cubis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca EvansSummer Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia rebecca.evans@summerfoundation.org.au.ORCID 0009-0005-3230-6746
Jacinta DouglasSummer Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-6624
Di WinklerSummer Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-6248
Lee CubisSummer Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-8896-9117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAround the world, the disability rights movements and the social model of disability have placed emphasis on the importance of social participation for people with disability. People with physical disability who have high and complex support needs often need support to access their communities, however, very little is known about the interaction between support and social participation for this population of people. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to explore the literature related to the interaction between support and social participation for adults with disability and understand any existing gaps in the literature where further research may be required in order to maximise quality support and social participation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted and reported according to scoping review guidelines outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and later modified by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: It is anticipated that the findings of this scoping review will be made available in peer-reviewed publications and also in plain language formats to ensure accessibility to a wide range of audiences. Ethics will not be required for this scoping review.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSocial ParticipationSocial SupportHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicNeurological injuryNeuromuscular diseaseSocial InteractionStroke

Identifiers

PMID38816056
PMCPMC11138261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.