ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Absence of the Susceptibility Vessel Sign with Cancer-Associated Hypercoagulability-Related Stroke.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe susceptibility vessel sign, a hypointense signal on MR T2-weighted gradient-recalled echo images, is associated with erythrocyte-predominant thrombi, which are often present in cardioembolism. In contrast, cancer-associated hypercoagulability (CAH)-related stroke, which is presumably caused by fibrin-predominant thrombi, is associated with the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign. We hypothesized that the prevalence of the susceptibility vessel sign may be helpful in distinguishing CAH-related stroke from cardioembolism. This study attempted to validate this hypothesis and investigated the usefulness of the susceptibility vessel sign in differentiating CAH-related stroke from cardioembolism. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively studied patients with both CAH-related stroke (CAH group) and cardioembolism (cardioembolism group) who had major cerebral artery occlusion on MRA that was performed within 6 hours of stroke onset. All patients visited our department from 2015 to 2021. CAH-related stroke was defined as the following: 1) complication of active cancer, 2) pretreatment D-dimer value of >3 μg/mL, 3) multiple vascular territory infarctions, and 4) lack of any other specifically identified causes of stroke. We compared susceptibility vessel sign positivity rates within each group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between the absence of the susceptibility vessel sign and CAH-related stroke.
resultsOf 691 patients with CAH-related stroke or cardioembolism, major cerebral artery occlusion was observed in 10 patients in the CAH group and 198 patients in the cardioembolism group. The absence of the susceptibility vessel sign was identified in 55 of 208 patients and was significantly more frequent in the CAH group versus the cardioembolism group (90% versus 24%,
conclusionsThe absence of the susceptibility vessel sign was more frequent in CAH-related stroke than in cardioembolism. These findings could potentially be helpful for clinical management and differentiating cardioembolism and CAH-related stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.