ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024
Using DNA metabarcoding to characterize national scale diatom-environment relationships and to develop indicators in streams and rivers of the United States.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Craticula vanensis sp. nov., a new species of diatom with a complex mitogenome, inhabiting soda lakes in central Europe and Anatolia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Pesticide Mixtures and Environmental Factors on Benthic Diatom Communities: A Microcosm Approach.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- A model-based assessment of anthropogenic disturbance on lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in DNA techniques, metabarcoding, and bioinformatics could help expand the use of benthic diatoms in monitoring and assessment programs by providing relatively quick and increasingly cost-effective ways to quantify diatom diversity in environmental samples. However, such applications of DNA-based approaches are relatively new, and in the United States, unknowns regarding their applications at large scales exist because only a few small-scale studies have been done. Here, we present results from the first nationwide survey to use DNA metabarcoding (rbcL) of benthic diatoms, which were collected from 1788 streams and rivers across nine ecoregions spanning the conterminous USA. At the national scale, we found that diatom assemblage structure (1) was strongly associated with total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations, conductivity, and pH and (2) had clear patterns that corresponded with differences in these variables among the nine ecoregions. These four variables were strong predictors of diatom assemblage structure in ecoregion-specific analyses, but our results also showed that diatom-environment relationships, the importance of environmental variables, and the ranges of these variables within which assemblage changes occurred differed among ecoregions. To further examine how assemblage data could be used for biomonitoring purposes, we used indicator species analysis to identify ecoregion-specific taxa that decreased or increased along each environmental gradient, and we used their relative abundances of gene reads in samples as metrics. These metrics were strongly correlated with their corresponding variable of interest (e.g., low phosphorus diatoms with total phosphorus concentrations), and generalized additive models showed how their relationships compared among ecoregions. These large-scale national patterns and nine sets of ecoregional results demonstrated that diatom DNA metabarcoding is a robust approach that could be useful to monitoring and assessment programs spanning the variety of conditions that exist throughout the conterminous United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.