Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38815808›Full record

ArticleJournal of food protection2024

Sources and Prevalence of Cyclospora cayetanensis in Southeastern U.S. Growing Environments.

Amy M Kahler, Jessica Hofstetter, Michael Arrowood, Anna Peterson, David Jacobson, Joel Barratt, Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da Silva, Camila Rodrigues, Mia C Mattioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food protection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SenescentMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amy M KahlerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Jessica HofstetterChenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, Chesapeake, VA 23320, USA; Auburn University, Department of Horticulture, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Michael ArrowoodCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Anna PetersonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
David JacobsonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Joel BarrattCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Andre Luiz Biscaia Ribeiro da SilvaAuburn University, Department of Horticulture, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Camila RodriguesAuburn University, Department of Horticulture, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Mia C MattioliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. Electronic address: mmattioli@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent cyclosporiasis outbreaks associated with fresh produce grown in the United States highlight the need to better understand Cyclospora cayetanensis prevalence in U.S. agricultural environments. In this study, C. cayetanensis occurrence was assessed in municipal wastewater sludge, on-farm portable toilets, irrigation pond water, and spent packing house dump tank water in a Southeastern Georgia growing region over two years. Detection of the C. cayetanensis 18S rRNA qPCR gene target in pond samples was 0%, 28%, and 42% (N = 217) depending on the detection definition used, and ≤1% in dump tank samples (N = 46). However, no qPCR detections were confirmed by sequencing, suggesting false detection occurred due to cross-reactions. C. cayetanensis qPCR detections were confirmed in 9% of wastewater sludge samples (N = 76). The human-specific fecal markers HF183 and crAssphage were detected in 33% and 6% of pond samples, respectively, and 4% and 0% of dump tank samples, respectively. Despite community Cyclospora shedding and evidence of human fecal contamination in irrigation water, there was no correlation between C. cayetanensis and HF183 qPCR detections, further supporting that 18S gene target qPCR amplifications were due to cross-reactions. When evaluating C. cayetanensis qPCR environmental detection data, the impact of assay specificity and detection criteria should be considered. Moreover, additional sequence-based testing may be needed to appropriately interpret Cyclospora qPCR environmental data.

Indexed as

CyclosporaCyclosporiasisFecesHumansPrevalenceSewageSoutheastern United StatesWastewaterSewageWastewaterCyclosporaFoodborne pathogensFood safetyIrrigation waterProduceWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38815808
PMCPMC11288253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.