ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy
Advancing women's pelvic floor muscle function diagnosis: the EFSMAP examination and its reliability evaluation.
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle impairments is essential. The plethora of terms and the lack of evidence to support widely used pelvic floor muscle function (PFMF) measurements hinder diagnostic labels.
objectiveTo structure an examination of PFMF using visual observation and digital palpation and terms consistent with the ICF terminology, and to test its intra and interrater reliability/agreement.
methodsA panel of 9 physical therapists applied Delphi method to structure the PFMF exam under ICF terminology and to verify its measurements reproducibility. For reliability and agreement, a convenience sample of women aged 51.2 ± 14.7 years had the sensitivity to pressure, pain, muscle tone, involuntary movement reaction, control of voluntary movement (contraction/relaxation), coordination, strength, and endurance examined by two raters, in the same day for interrater (n = 40), and one week apart, for intrarater reliability (n = 25). Percent agreement, linear weighted kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman's limits of agreement were calculated (alpha = 0.05).
resultsFour round Delphi discussion structured the PFMF exam, named EFSMAP (Exame das Funções Sensoriais e Motoras do Assoalho Pélvico/Examination of Pelvic Floor Sensory and Motor Functions), set a list of concepts and instructions targeted at reproducibility and established PFMF diagnostic labels. Reliability, except for pain and tone, were moderate to excellent (Kw= 0.67-1.0 and ICC=0.48-0.82). Agreement was substantial for most PFMF features (0.64-1.00), except pain.
conclusionsThe EFSMAP was successfully developed as a valid and reliable exam to be used in research and clinical practice; it provides labels for the diagnosis of pelvic floor muscle impairments. It might be easily adopted worldwide as it uses ICF terminology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.