ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Evaluating Chemical Footprinting-Induced Perturbation of Protein Higher Order Structure.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting protein higher-order structural changes using kinase as a phospho-labeler.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Bottom-Up Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Protein Structure Characterization.Accounts of chemical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Specific amino acid footprinting mass spectrometry (MS) is an increasingly utilized method for elucidating protein higher order structure (HOS). It does this by adding to certain amino acid residues a mass tag, whose reaction extent depends on solvent accessibility and microenvironment of the protein. Unlike reactive free radicals and carbenes, these specific footprinters react slower than protein unfolding. Thus, their footprinting, under certain conditions, provokes structural changes to the protein, leading to labeling on non-native structures. It is critical to establish conditions (i.e., reagent concentrations, time of reaction) to ensure that the structure of the protein following footprinting remains native. Here, we compare the efficacy of five methods in assessing protein HOS following footprinting at the intact protein level and then further localize the perturbation at the peptide level. Three are MS-based methods that provide dose-response plot analysis, evaluation of Poisson distributions of precursor and products, and determination of the average number of modifications. These MS-based methods reliably and effectively indicate HOS perturbation at the intact protein level, whereas spectroscopic methods (circular dichroism (CD) and dynamic light scattering (DLS)) are less sensitive in monitoring subtle HOS perturbation caused by footprinting. Evaluation of HOS at the peptide level indicates regions that are sensitive to localized perturbations. Peptide-level analysis also provides higher resolution of the HOS perturbation, and we recommend using it for future footprinting studies. Overall, this work shows conclusive evidence for HOS perturbation caused by footprinting. Implementation of quality control workflows can identify conditions to avoid the perturbation, for footprinting, allowing accurate and reliable identification of protein structural changes that accompany, for example, ligand interactions, mutations, and changes in solution environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.