Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38815000›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Temporal dynamics of short-term neural adaptation across human visual cortex.

Amber Marijn Brands, Sasha Devore, Orrin Devinsky, Werner Doyle, Adeen Flinker, Daniel Friedman, Patricia Dugan, Jonathan Winawer, Iris Isabelle Anna Groen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integration of Visual Motion Signals in Reduced Visual Conditions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain responses vary in duration-modeling strategies and challenges.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amber Marijn BrandsInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-9567-2435
Sasha DevoreNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Orrin DevinskyNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Werner DoyleNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Adeen FlinkerNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Daniel FriedmanNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Patricia DuganNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jonathan WinawerDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-5586
Iris Isabelle Anna GroenInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-6128

Funding

Development and validation of empirical models of the neuronal population activity underlying non-invasive human brain measurementsR01MH111417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, DIJKHUIZEN, RICK M · 2016 to 2020
$4.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural responses in visual cortex adapt to prolonged and repeated stimuli. While adaptation occurs across the visual cortex, it is unclear how adaptation patterns and computational mechanisms differ across the visual hierarchy. Here we characterize two signatures of short-term neural adaptation in time-varying intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data collected while participants viewed naturalistic image categories varying in duration and repetition interval. Ventral- and lateral-occipitotemporal cortex exhibit slower and prolonged adaptation to single stimuli and slower recovery from adaptation to repeated stimuli compared to V1-V3. For category-selective electrodes, recovery from adaptation is slower for preferred than non-preferred stimuli. To model neural adaptation we augment our delayed divisive normalization (DN) model by scaling the input strength as a function of stimulus category, enabling the model to accurately predict neural responses across multiple image categories. The model fits suggest that differences in adaptation patterns arise from slower normalization dynamics in higher visual areas interacting with differences in input strength resulting from category selectivity. Our results reveal systematic differences in temporal adaptation of neural population responses between lower and higher visual brain areas and show that a single computational model of history-dependent normalization dynamics, fit with area-specific parameters, accounts for these differences.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalModels, NeurologicalVisual CortexAdultComputational BiologyElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38815000
PMCPMC11166327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.