Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814952›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2024

Loneliness Trajectories and Chronic Loneliness Around the World.

Mara Getz Sheftel, Rachel Margolis, Ashton M Verdery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Loneliness in Brazil.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mara Getz SheftelPopulation Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-8764
Rachel MargolisDepartment of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-591X
Ashton M VerderyDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-7580

Funding

The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Sarah Damaske · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Crossnational Comparisons of Kinlessness and Health: Past, Present and FutureR01AG060949 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI VERDERY, ASHTON MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development P2C-HD041025Government of Canada-Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 435-2017-0618NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060949NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NIH HHS 1R01AG060949Pennsylvania State University Population Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examine cross-national variation in (a) loneliness trajectories and (b) the association between common social risk factors and chronic loneliness in middle and older adulthood.

methodsUsing longitudinal data, we assess the country-level prevalence of loneliness trajectories (chronic, transitory, and no loneliness) and the extent of common social risk factors for loneliness (living alone, widowhood, divorce, no grandchildren, having chronic conditions, and never working) among adults 50 and older in 20 countries covering 47% of the global population in this age bracket. Additionally, we compare how the associations between social risk factors and chronic loneliness vary across countries.

resultsWe find considerable variation in the prevalence of chronic loneliness cross-nationally, ranging between 4% (Denmark) and 15% (Greece) of adults 50 and older. Living arrangements have the most consistent association with the likelihood of chronic loneliness across countries, with those ever living alone having an 8% higher likelihood of chronic loneliness on average across countries, with a range of 2%-25%. Additionally, those who never report working and those with chronic conditions have a higher likelihood of chronic loneliness across more than a third of the countries. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that policies and interventions targeted to middle age and older adults living alone and with limited work histories or with chronic conditions are critical in reducing the public health challenges of chronic loneliness.

Indexed as

LonelinessAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleGlobal HealthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsChronic lonelinessCross-national comparisonLife courseLiving arrangements

Identifiers

PMID38814952
PMCPMC11227000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.