ArticleJournal of vision2024
Feature-invariant processing of spatial segregation based on temporal asynchrony.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human visual grouping based on within- and cross-area temporal correlations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal asynchrony is a cue for the perceptual segregation of spatial regions. Past research found attribute invariance of this phenomenon such that asynchrony induces perceptual segmentation regardless of the changing attribute type, and it does so even when asynchrony occurs between different attributes. To test the generality of this finding and obtain insights into the underlying computational mechanism, we compared the segmentation performance for changes in luminance, color, motion direction, and their combinations. Our task was to detect the target quadrant in which a periodic alternation in attribute was phase-delayed compared to the remaining quadrants. When stimulus elements made a square-wave attribute change, target detection was not clearly attribute invariant, being more difficult for motion direction change than for luminance or color changes and nearly impossible for the combination of motion direction and luminance or color. We suspect that waveform mismatch might cause anomalous behavior of motion direction since a square-wave change in motion direction is a triangular-wave change in the spatial phase (i.e., a second-order change in the direction of the spatial phase change). In agreement with this idea, we found that the segregation performance was strongly affected by the waveform type (square wave, triangular wave, or their combination), and when this factor was controlled, the performance was nearly, though not perfectly, invariant against attribute type. The results were discussed with a model in which different visual attributes share a common asynchrony-based segmentation mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.