ArticlePloS one2024
Graphical analysis of agent-based opinion formation models.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring team dynamics and performance in extended space missions using agent-based modeling.PloS one · 2025Article
- Probabilistic analysis of agent-based opinion formation models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agent-based models of opinion formation are becoming increasingly complex, because of their size and of the embedding of several individual psychological traits of the agents, aimed at realistically capturing the multifaceted aspects of social interaction. Therefore, the characterisation of the model properties mostly relies on simulation-based numerical approaches: more techniques are needed to analyse, contrast, and compare the properties of different models. We propose a novel graphical technique, which relies on the Agreement Plot to visualise the evolution of opinion distributions over time, that allows us to unveil behavioural patterns and capabilities of agent-based opinion formation models. Our proposed approach can be used to characterise the relation between global properties of the model evolution and the model features (initial opinion distributions, agent parameters, underlying digraphs), and is here showcased through its application to both seminal and recently proposed opinion formation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.