Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814920›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Development of a curricular thread to foster medical students' critical reflection and promote action on climate change, health, and equity.

Trisha Dalapati, Emily J Alway, Sneha Mantri, Phillip Mitchell, Ian A George, Samantha Kaplan, Kathryn M Andolsek, J Matthew Velkey, Jennifer Lawson, Andrew J Muzyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Trisha DalapatiDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6319-5253
Emily J AlwayDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2524-7539
Sneha MantriProgram in Medical Humanities, Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities & History of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Phillip MitchellInterprofessional Education Program, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, OR, United States of America.
Ian A GeorgeDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Samantha KaplanDuke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5340-1754
Kathryn M AndolsekDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7994-3869
J Matthew VelkeyPractice of Medical Education, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Jennifer LawsonTrent Center for Bioethics, Humanities & History of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Andrew J MuzykPractice of Medical Education, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-2466

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to the health consequences arising from climate change, medical students will inevitably interact with affected patients during their training and careers. Accordingly, medical schools must incorporate education on the impacts of climate change on health and equity into their curricula. We created a curricular thread called "Climate Change, Health, and Equity" in the first-year preclinical medical program to teach foundational concepts and foster self-reflection and critical consciousness.

methodsThe authors developed a continuum of practice including administrators, educators and faculty members, students, and community partners to plan and design curricular activities. First-year medical students at Duke University School of Medicine participated in seven mandatory foundational lectures and two experiential learning opportunities in the local community. Following completion of activities, students wrote a critical reflection essay and completed a self-directed learning exercise. Essays were evaluated using the REFLECT rubric to assess if students achieved critical reflection and for thematic analysis by Bloom's Taxonomy.

resultsAll students (118) submitted essays. A random sample of 30 (25%) essays underwent analysis. Evaluation by the REFLECT rubric underscored that all students were reflecting or critically reflecting on thread content. Thematic analysis highlighted that all students (30/30, 100%) were adept at identifying new areas of medical knowledge and connecting concepts to individual experiences, institutional practices, and public health and policy. Most students (27/30; 90%) used emotionally laden words, expressing negative feelings like frustration and fear but also positive sentiments of solidarity and hope regarding climate change and effects on health. Many students (24/30; 80%) expressed actionable items at every level including continuing self-directed learning and conversing with patients, minimizing healthcare waste, and advocating for climate-friendly policies.

conclusionAfter participating in the curricular thread, most medical students reflected on cognitive, affective, and actionable aspects relating to climate change, health, and equity.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeCurriculumStudents, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHealth EquityHumansMaleProblem-Based Learning

Identifiers

PMID38814920
PMCPMC11139332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.