Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814876›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The function and consequences of fluorescence in tetrapods.

Michaël P J Nicolaï, Michael J Bok, Javier Abalos, Liliana D'Alba, Matthew D Shawkey, Jonathan Goldenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michaël P J NicolaïBiology Department, Evolution and Optics of Nanostructures Group, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9570-0311
Michael J BokLund Vision Group, Department of Biology, University of Lund, Lund 22362, Sweden.
Javier AbalosDivision of Biodiversity and Evolution, Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-7420
Liliana D'AlbaNaturalis Biodiversity Center, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Matthew D ShawkeyBiology Department, Evolution and Optics of Nanostructures Group, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Jonathan GoldenbergBiology Department, Evolution and Optics of Nanostructures Group, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.

Funding

Belgian American Educational Foundation (BAEF) BAEF FellowshipBOF UGENT BOF.PDO.2022.0015.01DOD | USAF | AMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-18-0-0447Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) G007117NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) G0E8322NMargarita Salas ms21-053Vetenskapsrådet grant NAWenner-Gren Foundation (WGF) UPD2022-0061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence, the optical phenomenon whereby short-wavelength light is absorbed and emitted at longer wavelengths, has been widely described in aquatic habitats, in both invertebrates and fish. Recent years have seen a stream of articles reporting fluorescence, ranging from frogs, platypus, to even fully terrestrial organisms such as flying squirrels, often explicitly or implicitly linking the presence of fluorescence with sexual selection and communication. However, many of these studies fail to consider the physiological requirements of evolutionary stable signaling systems, the environmental dependence of perception, or the possible adaptive role of fluorescent coloration in a noncommunicative context. More importantly, the idea that fluorescence may simply constitute an indirect by-product of selection on other traits is often not explored. This is especially true for terrestrial systems where environmental light conditions are often not amenable for fluorescent signaling in contrast to, for example, aquatic habitats in which spectral properties of water promote functional roles for fluorescence. Despite the appeal of previously unknown ways in which coloration may drive evolution, the investigation of a putative role of fluorescence in communication must be tempered by a realistic understanding of its limitations. Here, we not only highlight and discuss the key body of literature but also address the potential pitfalls when reporting fluorescence and how to solve them. In addition, we propose exciting different research avenues to advance the field of tetrapod fluorescence.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimal CommunicationAnimalsEcosystemFluorescenceVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID38814876
PMCPMC11181051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.