Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814697›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

The larva and adult of

Shuai-Shuai Zhang, Pei-Chao Wang, Chao Ning, Ke Yang, Guo-Cheng Li, Lin-Lin Cao, Ling-Qiao Huang, Chen-Zhu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The lepidopteran analyst: how caterpillars, moths and butterflies encode taste identity and valence.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nanosilica supplementation in tomato increases oviposition on stems and caterpillar mortality in the tomato pinworm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuai-Shuai Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-9240
Pei-Chao Wang *State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chao NingState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ke YangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-3373
Guo-Cheng LiState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lin-Lin CaoState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ling-Qiao HuangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chen-Zhu WangState Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-8621

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 6224062National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFD1400800National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost all herbivorous insects feed on plants and use sucrose as a feeding stimulant, but the molecular basis of their sucrose reception remains unclear.

Indexed as

LarvaMothsSensillaSucroseAnimalsHelicoverpa armigeraTasteTaste PerceptionSucrosecotton bollwormCRISPR/Cas9ecologygustatory receptorsucroseXenopus oocyte expression and two-electrode voltage-clamp

Identifiers

PMID38814697
PMCPMC11139476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.