Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814681›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Effectiveness of a Mental Health Chatbot for People With Chronic Diseases: Randomized Controlled Trial.

A Luke MacNeill, Shelley Doucet, Alison Luke

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04620668 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Mental Health Chatbot in a Healthcare Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorLuke MacNeillRan2021 to 2022Enrolled79ConditionsArthritis, Diabetes, Depression, AnxietyArmsWysa
NCT07167056 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence-Powered Support For Quality Of Life Improvement In Patients With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsCancerArmsStandard of Care Psychotherapy, WYSA App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Mental Health Impacts of Internet Scams.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Luke MacNeillCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-4100
Shelley DoucetCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-8199
Alison LukeCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-579X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with chronic diseases tend to experience more mental health issues than their peers without these health conditions. Mental health chatbots offer a potential source of mental health support for people with chronic diseases.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether a mental health chatbot can improve mental health in people with chronic diseases. We focused on 2 chronic diseases in particular: arthritis and diabetes.

methodsIndividuals with arthritis or diabetes were recruited using various web-based methods. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Those in the treatment group used a mental health chatbot app (Wysa [Wysa Inc]) over a period of 4 weeks. Those in the control group received no intervention. Participants completed measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7), and stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10) at baseline, with follow-up testing 2 and 4 weeks later. Participants in the treatment group completed feedback questions on their experiences with the app at the final assessment point.

resultsA total of 68 participants (n=47, 69% women; mean age 42.87, SD 11.27 years) were included in the analysis. Participants were divided evenly between the treatment and control groups. Those in the treatment group reported decreases in depression (P<.001) and anxiety (P<.001) severity over the study period. No such changes were found among participants in the control group. No changes in stress were reported by participants in either group. Participants with arthritis reported higher levels of depression (P=.004) and anxiety (P=.004) severity than participants with diabetes over the course of the study, as well as higher levels of stress (P=.01); otherwise, patterns of results were similar across these health conditions. In response to the feedback questions, participants in the treatment group said that they liked many of the functions and features of the app, the general design of the app, and the user experience. They also disliked some aspects of the app, with most of these reports focusing on the chatbot's conversational abilities.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that mental health chatbots can be an effective source of mental health support for people with chronic diseases such as arthritis and diabetes. Although cost-effective and accessible, these programs have limitations and may not be well suited for all individuals.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04620668; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04620668.

Indexed as

anxietyapplicationarthritischatbotchronic diseasedepressiondiabeteseffectivenessmental healthstress

Identifiers

PMID38814681
PMCPMC11176869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.