Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814565›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2024

Four phases of a force transient emerge from a binary mechanical system.

Josh E Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Josh E BakerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA. jebaker@unr.edu.

Funding

A Multi-Scale Study of the Interplay Between Force Generating and Force Sensing MR01HL090938 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BAKER, JONATHAN E. · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090938U.S.A. National Institutes of Health 1R01HL090938-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate models of muscle contraction are important for understanding both muscle performance and the therapeutics that enhance physiological function. However, models are only accurate and meaningful if they are consistent with physical laws. A single muscle fiber contains billions of randomly fluctuating atoms that on the spatial scale of a muscle fiber generate unidirectional force and power output. This thermal system is formally constrained by the laws of thermodynamics, and a recently developed thermodynamic model of muscle force generation provides qualitative descriptions of the muscle force-velocity relationship, muscle force generation, muscle force transients, and the thermodynamic work loop of muscle with a thermodynamic (not molecular) power stroke mechanism. To demonstrate the accuracy of this model requires that its outputs be quantitatively compared with experimentally observed muscle function. Here I show that a two-state thermodynamic model accurately describes the experimentally observed four-phase force transient response to both mechanical and chemical perturbations. This is the simplest possible model of one of the most complex characteristic signatures of muscle mechanics.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansModels, BiologicalMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalThermodynamicsEntropic SpringMuscleMyosin SwitchesThermodynamicTransient

Identifiers

PMID38814565
PMCPMC11554880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.