ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion - technical evolution and long-term follow-up.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posterior Cervicothoracic Fusion During Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion: Sagittal Alignment and Deformity Outcomes.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing refractory upper-extremity pain.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrachial plexus avulsion (BPA) injuries can cause severe deafferentation pain. This has been successfully treated with dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning. Distortions in anatomy following a BPA injury can make identifying neural structures challenging. We describe a modification to the operative technique that improves the surgical view and the advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) employed to identify DREZ. We have analysed the long-term outcomes for pain, quality of life, and complications in patients undergoing DREZ lesioning.
methodsThis is a single-centre retrospective case series including patients who underwent DREZ lesioning with IONM for brachial plexus avulsion between 2012 and 2022. Analysed data included pre- and postoperative pain (VAS), quality of life score for chronic pain, and complications. The evolution of the surgical approach is discussed.
results44 consecutive patients underwent a DREZ lesioning procedure with intraoperative monitoring and mapping. In these patients the mean VAS score improved from 8.9 (7-10) to 1.87 (0-6) (p < 0.0001) at the time of discharge. 31 patients were followed-up for more than 12 months with a mean duration of follow-up of 41 months and their results were as follows: the mean VAS improved from 9.0 (7-10) to 4.1 (0-9) (p < 0.0001) at the last follow-up and the mean QOL values improved from 3.7 (2-6) to 7.4 (4-10) (p < 0.0001). The long-term outcomes were 'good' in 39%, 'fair' in 29% and 'poor' in 32% of patients. 55% of the patients were able to stop or reduce pain medications.
conclusionsModifications of surgical technique provide better exposure of DREZ, and IONM aids in identifying DREZ in the presence of severe intra-dural changes. Long-term outcomes of DREZ lesioning indicate not only a reduction in pain but also a significant improvement in quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38814478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.