Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814439›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2024

Family communication of cancer genetic test results in an ethnically diverse population: a qualitative exploration of more than 200 patients.

Rachel Hodan, Miles Picus, Caroline Stanclift, Kelly E Ormond, Jennifer Morales Pichardo, Allison W Kurian, Charité Ricker, Gregory E Idos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rachel HodanCancer Genetics and Genomics, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA. rhodan@stanfordhealthcare.org.
Miles PicusDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Caroline StancliftDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kelly E OrmondDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer Morales PichardoCenter for Precision Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Allison W KurianDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Charité RickerUniversity of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gregory E IdosDivision of Gastroenterology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000131 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Myriad Genetics No. KL2-TR000131 and P30-CA014089NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000131NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research on family communication of cancer genetic test results has primarily focused on non-Hispanic White patients with high-risk pathogenic variants (PV). There are limited data on patient communication of moderate-risk PVs, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and negative results. This qualitative study examined communication of positive, negative, and VUS hereditary cancer multi-gene panel (MGP) results in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population. As part of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 2000 patients who underwent MGP testing at three hospitals in California, USA, free-text written survey responses to the question: "Feel free to share any thoughts or experiences with discussing genetic test results with others" were collected from participant questionnaires administered at 3 and 12-months post results disclosure. Content and thematic analyses were performed using a theory-driven analysis, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), on 256 responses from 214 respondents. Respondents with high perceived utility of sharing genetic test results often reported positive attitudes towards sharing test results and direct encouragement for genetic testing of others. Respondents with high self-efficacy in the sharing process were likely to report high perceived utility of sharing, whereas patients with low self-efficacy more often had VUS results and were more likely to report uncertainty about sharing. Consistent with TPB, our findings suggest that clinician reinforcement of the utility of genetic testing may increase intent for patients to communicate genetic information. Our findings suggest that clinicians should focus on strategies to improve patient understanding of VUS results.

Indexed as

Cancer geneticsFamily communicationGenetic counselingGermline genetic test results

Identifiers

PMID38814439
PMCPMC11410745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.