Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38814069›Full record

ReviewCardiology in review

Nanotechnology: The Future for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Intervention in Cardiovascular Diseases is Here.

Jude Elsaygh, Anas Zaher, Manish A Parikh, William H Frishman, Stephen J Peterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology in review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jude ElsayghFrom the Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY.
Anas ZaherFrom the Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY.
Manish A ParikhFrom the Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY.
William H FrishmanDepartment of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.
Stephen J PetersonFrom the Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in technology and medicine over the last 3 decades, cardiovascular medicine has evolved tremendously. Nanotechnology provides a promising future in personalized precision medicine. In this review, we delve into the current and prospective applications of nanotechnology and nanoparticles in cardiology. Nanotechnology has allowed for point-of-care testing such as high-sensitivity troponins, as well as more precise cardiac imaging. This review is focused on 3 diseases within cardiology: coronary artery disease, heart failure, and valvular heart disease. The use of nanoparticles in coronary stents has shown success in preventing in-stent thrombosis, as well as using nanosized drug delivery medications to prevent neointimal proliferation in a way that spares systemic toxicity. In addition, by using nanoparticles as drug delivery systems, nanotechnology can be utilized in the delivery of goal-directed medical therapy in heart failure patients. It has also been shown to improve cell therapy in this patient population by helping in cell retention of grafts. Finally, the use of nanoparticles in the manufacturing of bioprosthetic valves provides a promising future for the longevity and success of cardiac valve repair and replacement.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNanotechnologyDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlescardiovascular medicinecoronary artery diseaseheart failurenanotechnologyvalvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID38814069
PMCPMC13629646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.