Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38813751›Full record

ArticleSmall methods2024

Advancing Nanomaterial Toxicology Screening Through Efficient and Cost-Effective Quantitative Proteomics.

Tobias Stobernack, Nils Dommershausen, Víctor Alcolea-Rodríguez, Rico Ledwith, Miguel A Bañares, Andrea Haase, Mario Pink, Verónica I Dumit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias StobernackGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-1555
Nils DommershausenGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Víctor Alcolea-RodríguezGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Rico LedwithGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Miguel A BañaresSpanish National Research Council - Institute of Catalysis and Petrochemistry (ICP-CSIC), Spectroscopy and Industrial Catalysis group, Marie Curie, 2, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Andrea HaaseGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Mario PinkGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.
Verónica I DumitGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, 10589, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-5091-4284

Funding

Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung 1322-777Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 953183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic investigations yield high-dimensional datasets, yet their application to large-scale toxicological assessments is hindered by reproducibility challenges due to fluctuating measurement conditions. To address these limitations, this study introduces an advanced tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling protocol. Although labeling approaches shorten data acquisition time by multiplexing samples compared to traditional label-free quantification (LFQ) methods in general, the associated costs may surge significantly with large sample sets, for example, in toxicological screenings. However, the introduced advanced protocol offers an efficient, cost-effective alternative, reducing TMT reagent usage (by a factor of ten) and requiring minimal biological material (1 µg), while demonstrating increased reproducibility compared to LFQ. To demonstrate its effectiveness, the advanced protocol is employed to assess the toxicity of nine benchmark nanomaterials (NMs) on A549 lung epithelial cells. While LFQ measurements identify 3300 proteins, they proved inadequate to reveal NM toxicity. Conversely, despite detecting 2600 proteins, the TMT protocol demonstrates superior sensitivity by uncovering alterations induced by NM treatment. In contrast to previous studies, the introduced advanced protocol allows simultaneous and straightforward assessment of multiple test substances, enabling prioritization, ranking, and grouping for hazard evaluation. Additionally, it fosters the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), contributing to innovative methodologies in toxicological research.

Indexed as

NanostructuresProteomicsA549 CellsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryToxicity Testsadverse outcome pathway (AOP)mode of action (MoA)nanomaterials (NMs)new approach methodologies (NAMs)proteomicsTandem mass tag (TMT)

Identifiers

PMID38813751
PMCPMC11671853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.